> > Well we have multiple container invokers listening on 4444 at the
> > same time, right? One per EJB, it looks like. So why is
> it OK to have
> > several within one jBoss but not several across several jBoss-es?
>
> Because of the way RMI works. Several objects can use the same socket
> listener within the same VM.
This seems to correspond to the CORBA/POA POAManager that I was rambling
about earlier;-)
> Otherwise you would have one server socket per object, i.e.
> requiring one
> port per object. Now that wouldn't be too good would it...
Makes sense... but the IP-port number shouldn't be hardcode. Why not put it
in a config-file!?!
/Per
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
