> > Otherwise you would have one server socket per object, i.e. > > requiring one > > port per object. Now that wouldn't be too good would it... > > Makes sense... but the IP-port number shouldn't be hardcode. Why not put it > in a config-file!?! You are, of course, absolutaly correct. Should be, will be. /Rickard -- -------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- AW: [jBoss-User] jBoss, firewalls & SSL/TLS Scherr Gerolf
- Re: AW: [jBoss-User] jBoss, firewalls & SSL/TLS Aaron Mulder
- Re: AW: [jBoss-User] jBoss, firewalls & SSL/TLS Rickard Oberg
- Re: AW: [jBoss-User] jBoss, firewalls & SSL... Aaron Mulder
- Re: AW: [jBoss-User] jBoss, firewalls &... Rickard Oberg
- RE: [jBoss-User] jBoss, firewalls & SSL/TLS marc fleury
- RE: AW: [jBoss-User] jBoss, firewalls & SSL/TLS Per Bockman
- AW: [jBoss-User] jBoss, firewalls & SSL/TLS Rickard Oberg
- AW: [jBoss-User] jBoss, firewalls & SSL/TLS Scherr Gerolf
