Hi!
Ari Suutari wrote:
> > Offtopic, skip if you want.
> >
> > I don't think we're getting much more in this discussion regarding
> > right/wrong/better/worse, but at least it's clarifying :-)
> >
>
> [ most of the mail removed ]
>
> I think that there is another view to these things. It is
> currently (quite easily) possible to find people who
> have JSP skills (or ASP at least - it is easy to
> migrate to JSP ;-) but people who know Enhydra &
> XMLC are quite rare (at least here in Finland, Lappeenranta).
>
> What I'm trying to say it doesn't matter how great a tecnology
> is if there aren't any people who know how to use it.
> There isn't always time to learn everything from the beginning.
Excellent point, and FWIW this is probably the single largest problem
with J2EE today: not enough people know it! Which is one reason an
OpenSource project such as jBoss is incredibly important because it
helps get more developers into J2EE.
Another conclusion from your statement (IMHO anyway) is that any
framework should be simple. Too much, regardless of its excellence, just
won't work because people don't take the time to learn it. After looking
at Turbine/Jetspeed and similar this is the biggest problem with them,
technical points aside: they're just too big.
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.jboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
