It does help, but unfortunetely, you need to recompile WebXmlReader.java
to get jikes working... The tomcat 3.2 branch doesn't support global
web.xml configuration.
Kenneth Topp
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Manik Surtani wrote:
> yes, jikes would do wonders to performance ... doesnt tomcat already support
> jikes, though?
> - manik
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe Shevland
> > Sent: 09 November 2000 11:09 AM
> > To: jBoss
> > Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] Tomcat performance
> >
> >
> > I don't get this... I'm using Tomcat 3.1 (supposedly much slower
> > than 3.2bX) and I don't see anywhere near these compilation
> > times... and on a much lower spec than that Athlon quoted
> > (FreeBSD 3.5/Pentium III 500Mhz/256MB ram). As a rough guess the
> > average compilation of some of the bigger JSP's would never
> > exceed 3 seconds.
> >
> > I'm only writing this because I'm about to upgrade to 3.2 but
> > I'll give it a wide girth if its this slow (though I've heard
> > they've made a lot of speed improvements in 3.2, optimising and
> > reusing streams etc.)
> >
> > It may also be a good idea to add a parameter/setting so that
> > jikes can be used in the compilation of the pages (way faster).
> > And where's the patch I hear them cry ;) sorry too busy.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Joe
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury
> > > Sent: Thursday, 9 November 2000 3:05 PM
> > > To: jBoss
> > > Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] Tomcat performance
> > >
> > >
> > > Ok
> > >
> > > yes it would be good, the fact is that it makes everyone look
> > bad... click
> > > on a page and wait 20 seconds for compil is just a demo killer.
> > >
> > > I can wave my arms all I want and explain why aliens work with EJB and
> > > automated persistence, no one is going to believe me (no one is going to
> > > believe me anyway).
> > >
> > > Also, is Catalina also a dead horse or is it at least moving fast ?
> > >
> > > marc
> > >
> > >
> > > |-----Original Message-----
> > > |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Manik Surtani
> > > |Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 8:06 PM
> > > |To: jBoss
> > > |Subject: [jBoss-User] Tomcat performance
> > > |
> > > |
> > > |Why, though, is this the case with tomcat? i am tempted to open up the
> > > |tomcat sources and see what can be done to improve things ...
> > > |
> > > |i am a strong tomcat bcker, and yes, even i would like to see its
> > > |performance improve. do you all see such sluggishness only in
> > > jsps, but in
> > > |servlets as well? and is it just in the compilation that you see this?
> > > |
> > > |- manik
> > > |
> > > |
> > > |> -----Original Message-----
> > > |> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > |> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan OConnor
> > > |> Sent: 08 November 2000 11:41 PM
> > > |> To: jBoss
> > > |> Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Enhydra in jboss
> > > |>
> > > |>
> > > |> On 8 Nov 00, at 17:32, Rickard �berg wrote:
> > > |>
> > > |> > > The main reason we are talking about this is
> > > |> > > 1- Tomcat really pisses me off :) (the slow part and the rest
> > > |> that we saw :)
> > > |> >
> > > |> > Yeah, I'm working with Tomcat now and it is dead slow,
> > > |especially on JSP
> > > |> > compilation.. geeeezzzuzzz.. it can take 10 secs up to 30.
> > > on a Athlon
> > > |> > 650MHz/256...
> > > |> >
> > > |>
> > > |> Maybe we should bump up the priority of the Orion integration. :-)
> > > |>
> > > |> -Dan
> > > |>
> > > |>
> > > |> --
> > > |> --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > |> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > |> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > |> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > |
> > > |
> > > |
> > > |--
> > > |--------------------------------------------------------------
> > > |To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > |To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > |Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > |
> > > |
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
