Hi!
If I had to understand this thing (without having read this discussion)
it would be easier for me to understand the description of the options
than figuring out how "db-shared" and "commit" options interact.
If it's still unclear, add a short commit option description to the FAQ.
(If I'd understand in detail what your talking about, I would have added
that FAQ entry. But I don't fully understand the consequences of the
commit option).
Just my $.02
Tobias
Rickard �berg wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> marc fleury wrote:
> > I don't care...
> > I think A, B, C should remain as 3 choices
> > but DB-Shared should have true false. (2 choices)
> > true: B or C (I think B is ok ?)
> > false: A is OK
>
> Uhm.. ok... so, one can both commit-option and db-shared flags, but if
> db-shared is included then it overrides commit-option?! That will be
> confusing I think.
>
> Why not add "db-is-shared" as an alias for "C" and "db-is-not-shared" as
> an alias for "A" in commit-option? I think that would be easier to
> understand.
>
> /Rickard
>
> --
> Rickard �berg
>
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.telkel.com
> http://www.jboss.org
> http://www.dreambean.com
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
