There will not be support for server.xml/webapps from me for the forseeable
future as it does not allow for a true integration:

1. Inadequate integrated security. JBoss is moving to a notion of security
domains
that define user authentication, authorization, KeyStores needed by SSL
and other crypto functionality.
2. Virtual hosts are a notion that affect all exposed interfaces, not just
the web
container.
3. Optimized EJB invocations
4. log4j driven logging into the JBoss server log
5. One configuration filie and format: JBoss mbeans

If you don't need this level of integration why even embed Tomcat in JBoss?

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss-Catalina 2.4.3 - server.xml file



> 3) I agree with you on this point, though my preference is to always
> deploy via jboss, because it's so much easier for me (Ant just drops in
> the file and I'm up and running).  I hope there will be a release soon
> where tomcat 4's server.xml is respected.  That was a problem with the
> JBoss/Tomcat3 bundle for a while.
>
> David
>



_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to