That's a good point. I'll look into minimizing the catalina footprint if allowed by the Apache license in the next release.
> After-thought / question: though I wouldn't do this, if someone wanted > to put catalina and jboss in separate jvm's, does jboss' security > propogate up? I'm guessing not... The default bundled JBossSecurityMgrRealm integrates based on a special JNDI context(java:comp/env/security). This could be remote enabled so that an external Tomcat instance could use the JBossSecurityMgrRealm as is to delegate authentication and authorization to the JBoss security domain to which the context was bound. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 3:12 PM Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss-Catalina 2.4.3 - server.xml file > Hmmm. I see your point - but then maybe the only stuff you package in > the jboss/tomcat bundle is the catalina jar files. Having all the other > stuff - especially the config files like server.xml - is a tease at best > and confusing at worst. > > Thanks for the wake-up, Scott. > > David > > _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
