It is supposed to be fixed now. It means it passes my simple testcase. But I get errors in my real case. Have you tried it on your case after the fix?
On Mon, 2002-05-27 at 22:44, Hunter Hillegas wrote: > I haven't had time to put together a test case yet. If you want to do that, > I'm sure Scott, et al would be happy to look at it. If not, I'll be working > on it sometime this week. > > As far as this being default behavior, that was discussed previously and it > sounds like they have some pretty good reasons to offer both sets of > functionality. > > Hunter > > > From: Marius Kotsbak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date: 27 May 2002 21:02:20 +0200 > > To: Hunter Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: JBoss User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Do I Not Understand Scoped Class LoadingRepositories > > for EARs? > > OK. The same case that I have. Tried to put the jboss-app.xml in > > META-INF in the .ears but I it does'n seem to solve the problem, so I > > think it is a bug. > > > > I also think that it is a bug that the boss-app-file is needed. The > > default should be not to share classes between ear/jar/wars. > > > > Have you submitted the files to demonstrate this problem? _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
