I haven't yet, but I will try it today and see what I end up with.
> From: Marius Kotsbak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 29 May 2002 19:38:22 +0200 > To: Hunter Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: JBoss User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Do I Not Understand Scoped Class LoadingRepositories > for EARs? > > It is supposed to be fixed now. It means it passes my simple testcase. > But I get errors in my real case. Have you tried it on your case after > the fix? > > On Mon, 2002-05-27 at 22:44, Hunter Hillegas wrote: >> I haven't had time to put together a test case yet. If you want to do that, >> I'm sure Scott, et al would be happy to look at it. If not, I'll be working >> on it sometime this week. >> >> As far as this being default behavior, that was discussed previously and it >> sounds like they have some pretty good reasons to offer both sets of >> functionality. >> >> Hunter >> >>> From: Marius Kotsbak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Date: 27 May 2002 21:02:20 +0200 >>> To: Hunter Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Cc: JBoss User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Do I Not Understand Scoped Class >>> LoadingRepositories >>> for EARs? >>> OK. The same case that I have. Tried to put the jboss-app.xml in >>> META-INF in the .ears but I it does'n seem to solve the problem, so I >>> think it is a bug. >>> >>> I also think that it is a bug that the boss-app-file is needed. The >>> default should be not to share classes between ear/jar/wars. >>> >>> Have you submitted the files to demonstrate this problem? > _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
