On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 20:12, Hunter Hillegas wrote: > Nope, my second EAR still throws the same exception. > > I am running on: > > JBoss Release: JBoss-3.0.0RC4 CVSTag=Branch_3_0 > > Just updated a few minutes ago... OK
> > I didn�t look at your test case. Did you try to deploy it on your new build? Yes. It works now.... > Did it work? If so, what is different between that testcase and the actual > EARs you are using? It is maybe that I actually try to use my beans, but just deployed the testbeans. I have posted my error. Do you get a similar error? Could you post yours also? >Why would it work and the other not work? > > >From CVS check-ins, it looks like Scott fixed an off-by-one error... But > maybe there is another problem? > > Hunter > > > From: Marius Kotsbak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: 29 May 2002 19:38:22 +0200 > > To: Hunter Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: JBoss User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Do I Not Understand Scoped Class LoadingRepositories > > for EARs? > > > > It is supposed to be fixed now. It means it passes my simple testcase. > > But I get errors in my real case. Have you tried it on your case after > > the fix? > > > > On Mon, 2002-05-27 at 22:44, Hunter Hillegas wrote: > >> I haven't had time to put together a test case yet. If you want to do that, > >> I'm sure Scott, et al would be happy to look at it. If not, I'll be working > >> on it sometime this week. > >> > >> As far as this being default behavior, that was discussed previously and it > >> sounds like they have some pretty good reasons to offer both sets of > >> functionality. > >> > >> Hunter > >> > >>> From: Marius Kotsbak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Date: 27 May 2002 21:02:20 +0200 > >>> To: Hunter Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> Cc: JBoss User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Do I Not Understand Scoped Class > >>> LoadingRepositories > >>> for EARs? > >>> OK. The same case that I have. Tried to put the jboss-app.xml in > >>> META-INF in the .ears but I it does'n seem to solve the problem, so I > >>> think it is a bug. > >>> > >>> I also think that it is a bug that the boss-app-file is needed. The > >>> default should be not to share classes between ear/jar/wars. > >>> > >>> Have you submitted the files to demonstrate this problem? > > _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
