Yup thats fine for the signalling of the supported file transfer methods, but how is that going to help actually negotiating the actual p2p transfer, ip address, port, size of file, name of file etc etc.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 5:48 PM Subject: Re: Re[2]: [JDEV] File transfers > What's wrong with using client feature negotiation for that? > > Dave Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Tijl Houtbeckers wrote: > > > > > This ofcourse still leaves the need for better p2p signaling. Best would be ofcourse to > > combine both of them, letting both clients indicate wich options they have and then > > choosing the best one together. Maybe some discussion on how this signalling can be > > done best is a good idea rather then argueing about wether inband is good or bad.. > > > > > Our ultimate goal would ofcourse be some sort of implementation for this and a JEP. > > _______________________________________________ > jdev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev > > _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
