Am Fr, 2003-11-28 um 14.09 schrieb Richard Dobson: > > would you implement presence 'invisible'? Think about it. > > What are you on about !?!?
Well... (was at lunch). The thought was, the protocol defines administration in p2p, for some reasons ... i.e. ban/kick, a client does not necessarily have to follow these specs, i can silently ignore a ban/kick. i pulled in an existing example, the same goes for the 'invisible' presence, to show that a p2p spec won't lead anywhere beside sharing streams. That really is my opinion on this. if a client doesn't implement presence inv. an inv user still is online... ulrich _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
