> Well... (was at lunch). Ok
> The thought was, the protocol defines administration in p2p, for some > reasons ... i.e. ban/kick, a client does not necessarily have to follow > these specs, i can silently ignore a ban/kick. Ah yes the client could ignore someone (quite a good idea), but whoever is the op/admin could also have the ability to kick someone from the chat entirely. > i pulled in an existing example, the same goes for the 'invisible' > presence, to show that a p2p spec won't lead anywhere beside sharing > streams. That really is my opinion on this. > if a client doesn't implement presence inv. an inv user still is > online... Not sure what you mean here, can you explain a little more? Thanks Richard _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
