The thought was, the protocol defines administration in p2p, for some reasons ... i.e. ban/kick, a client does not necessarily have to follow these specs, i can silently ignore a ban/kick.Ah yes the client could ignore someone (quite a good idea), but whoever is the op/admin could also have the ability to kick someone from the chat entirely.
Sure, that should be the initial person or the maintainer oif the conference. There shoudl also be a private area where people need the permission of - at leats - the maintainer to contribute.
i pulled in an existing example, the same goes for the 'invisible' presence, to show that a p2p spec won't lead anywhere beside sharing streams. That really is my opinion on this. if a client doesn't implement presence inv. an inv user still is online...
Only to be sure: Nobody should listen to a conference without to be visible for the other useres. No spys!
Carsten
_______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
