On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 10:33 -0100, Ghee Teo wrote: > Hi jedy, > > This is a good move! A couple of questions: > - Does this need to be arced?
I am not sure if arc is needed if we move a package from spec-files-other to spec-files. But personally, I think not. No package name is changed(If we do not move libnotify/notificaiton out of SUNWgnome-panel). No new libraries or APIs are imported. Because libsexy is already in Nevada. > - Now that we have a complete list of packages, ie.e. same as the rest > of the community, should we use a separate package name instead of > tagging onto gnome-panel? I agree. If nobody oppose, I will try to move libnotify/notificaion daemon out of SUNWgnome-panel. Regards, Jedy > > -Ghee > > Jedy Wang wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Currently, libsexy is in spec-files-other and all applications > > dependes on it are in spec-files-other too. But actually > > notification-daemon(in SUNWgnome-panel.spec) depends on libsexy too > > but the dependency is removed by a internal patch. This disables the > > support of sexy-url-label in notification-daemon. Now I propose to > > move libsexy from spec-files-other to spec-files to enable this > > feature and remove the patch we maintained internal. Attached is the > > patch to move libsexy fomr spec-files-other to spec-files, remove the > > internal patch and add the dependency to libsexy into SUNWgnome-panel. > > > > Regards, > > > > Jedy > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/jds-review/attachments/20080606/de93d8a0/attachment.html>
