On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 12:02 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:

> Ghee:
> 
> > This is a good move! A couple of questions:
> > - Does this need to be arced?
> 
> Probably not, unless moving libsexy into spec-files and making the
> notification-daemon depend on it exposes new interfaces to end
> users.  If this is just a change in the internal JDS private
> interfaces, there is no need to mention to ARC.

The only thing that users know is that libnotify supports html label
now.

> 
> > - Now that we have a complete list of packages, ie.e. same as the rest 
> > of the community, should we use a separate package name instead of 
> > tagging onto gnome-panel?
> 
> If I remember correctly, the GNOME community has been talking about
> eventually merging libsexy into GTK+ or some other base library.
> If libsexy will be a temporary library, it probably makes more
> sense to "hide" it in a package like the panel or base-libs
> package rather than making it more visible with a separate
> package.  Just my opinion, though.

Yes, there is a bug filed against this in bugzilla
(http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=508810). But I do not know
when will this be accomplished. If we can convince that it will go into
gtk in 1 or 2 GNOME release, we can just leave it alone. But if this
will take a real long time(such as 2 or 3 years), then it would be a
good idea to make a seperated package. IMPO, I think we put too many
applications/libraries in one signle package.

Regards,

Jedy

> 
> Brian
> 
> 
> > Jedy Wang wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Currently, libsexy is in spec-files-other and all applications 
> >> dependes on it are in spec-files-other too. But actually 
> >> notification-daemon(in SUNWgnome-panel.spec) depends on libsexy too 
> >> but the dependency is removed by a internal patch. This disables the 
> >> support of sexy-url-label in notification-daemon. Now I propose to 
> >> move libsexy from spec-files-other to spec-files to enable this 
> >> feature and remove the patch we maintained internal. Attached is the 
> >> patch to move libsexy fomr spec-files-other to spec-files, remove the 
> >> internal patch and add the dependency to libsexy into SUNWgnome-panel.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Jedy 
> > 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/jds-review/attachments/20080610/1493f696/attachment.html>

Reply via email to