On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 10:37 +0100, Matt Keenan wrote: > Jedy, > > Just wanted to confirm with you, as I couldn't find info in the 2.22 > materials > libsexy was not part of the 2.22 arc, correct ? > So I guess we would require ARC'ing this as part 2.24 ?
Hi Matt, I think libsexy was not part of 2.22 arc case because it had already been arced by Erwann in compiz arc case(http://sac.sfbay/Archives/CaseLog/arc/LSARC/2008/115/proposal.txt). So I think we do not need to worry about it for 2.24. Regards, Jedy > > cheers > > Matt > > > > Jedy Wang wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Currently, libsexy is in spec-files-other and all applications > > dependes on it are in spec-files-other too. But actually > > notification-daemon(in SUNWgnome-panel.spec) depends on libsexy too > > but the dependency is removed by a internal patch. This disables the > > support of sexy-url-label in notification-daemon. Now I propose to > > move libsexy from spec-files-other to spec-files to enable this > > feature and remove the patch we maintained internal. Attached is the > > patch to move libsexy fomr spec-files-other to spec-files, remove > > the internal patch and add the dependency to libsexy into > > SUNWgnome-panel. > > > > Regards, > > > > Jedy > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/jds-review/attachments/20080606/4b073f65/attachment.html>
