On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 11:45 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote: > Jedy: > > >>> - Now that we have a complete list of packages, ie.e. same as the rest > >>> of the community, should we use a separate package name instead of > >>> tagging onto gnome-panel? > >> If I remember correctly, the GNOME community has been talking about > >> eventually merging libsexy into GTK+ or some other base library. > >> If libsexy will be a temporary library, it probably makes more > >> sense to "hide" it in a package like the panel or base-libs > >> package rather than making it more visible with a separate > >> package. Just my opinion, though. > > > > Yes, there is a bug filed against this in bugzilla > > (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=508810). But I do not know > > when will this be accomplished. If we can convince that it will go into > > gtk in 1 or 2 GNOME release, we can just leave it alone. But if this > > will take a real long time(such as 2 or 3 years), then it would be a > > good idea to make a seperated package. IMPO, I think we put too many > > applications/libraries in one signle package. > > If the long-term plan is for libsexy to go away, then I think it makes > more sense for it to be integrated into an existing package. Why > add new packages and remove them in a few builds?
Hi Brian, I had considered to put libnoitfy/notification-daemon in SUNWgnome-base-libs but libnotify/notification-daemon depends on wnck which is in SUNWgnome-panel. So if we want to put libnotify/notification-daemon into an existing package, SUNWgnome-panel is the best choice. Regards, Jedy > > Brian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/jds-review/attachments/20080611/20b18ecc/attachment.html>
