James, what is the URL to the javadoc? Yes, that should definitely be in jenkins-ci.org and it should be pretty front-n-center, I would think....
On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 4:51:15 AM UTC-7, James Nord wrote: > > One thing I just realize is that we have our documentation (javadocs) on a > separate website. > Most sites these days just have a "documentation " section which will also > have an api section within the same site (and themed in an approriate > manner) such that you have a more cohesive view (and have something that > actually makes you want to come back to the site. > > We should also have separate javadocs for the latest LTS as well as > bleeding edge (you could make the case for keeping a certain number of > javadocs for prior LTS versions - you can still get Spring 2.0 javadocs > online even if it is not supported!) > > and (ot as the design goes) ssl-everywhere will be required as Google will > start ranking secure sites higher in the future. > > /James > > On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 12:02:02 AM UTC+1, Gus Reiber wrote: >> >> Hey all, >> So a related thread exists here >> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jenkinsci-dev/EMbE3a4u8nA>, but >> I have a couple of bits I didn't want lost in a thread. They are: >> >> - *We are hiring! *I am looking for a contract based web designer >> with a nice portfolio to show to help author new site templates and do >> some >> information architecture for Jenkins-ci.org. If you know someone, you can >> reach me on Twitter @gusreiber, or email me >> gusreiber(at-symb)cloudbees(dot-com) or find me on IRC, >> freenode/#jenkins/gusreiber. You would be part of a fairly tight 3 person >> team that would include myself, R Tyler Croy (whom you might know from >> such >> places as this list) and yourself. Daniel Beck, and KK and the will of >> the >> community will also be dropping their input along the way. >> >> - *We are discussing!* Even if you don't feel you have the time or >> qualifications to join the team in exchange for money, we still want to >> hear from you. >> >> With those two little action items out of the way, here is the gist of >> the discussion so far.... >> >> Jenkins.org has a website (http://jenkins-ci.org/), but it isn't very >> good, (made evident in part by the fact that I am posting this message to >> you through this site instead of that one). It contains some documentation, >> a few blog articles, the Jenkins bits (most importantly), and the plugins >> directory (next most importantly). It is my belief that this site needs to >> have more of a social, 2-way communication aspect to it such that it can >> truly be the mecca to which Jenkins developers turn when they want their >> soules to be filled with the light of CI/CD knowledge. >> >> To that ends, I have posted a proposal for what that might look here: >> >> https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Jenkins+2.0+Website+vision+from+Gus+Reiber >> >> https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/download/attachments/82673948/knowledge-site.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1443574130000 >> >> ...also, the plugin browsing experience really should be a lot better. >> To that ends, here is a related video: >> http://youtu.be/pMwsZRo5He8 >> >> If you've got $.02.... >> ...drop-em. >> >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/68949e0c-b142-4cfb-991c-871ae3bb403a%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
