Do you have any specific feedback other than disagreement with an assertion?
On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 2:10:28 PM UTC+11, Jesse Farinacci wrote: > > My $0.02 is that you're totally on the wrong track entirely. In the > redesign. In the claim that the website is shit. I don't think I've > ever disagreed more with a single person not working at Oracle. > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Gus Reiber <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > > Hey all, > > So a related thread exists here, but I have a couple of bits I didn't > > want lost in a thread. They are: > > > > We are hiring! I am looking for a contract based web designer with a > nice > > portfolio to show to help author new site templates and do some > information > > architecture for Jenkins-ci.org. If you know someone, you can reach me > on > > Twitter @gusreiber, or email me gusreiber(at-symb)cloudbees(dot-com) or > find > > me on IRC, freenode/#jenkins/gusreiber. You would be part of a fairly > tight > > 3 person team that would include myself, R Tyler Croy (whom you might > know > > from such places as this list) and yourself. Daniel Beck, and KK and the > > will of the community will also be dropping their input along the way. > > > > We are discussing! Even if you don't feel you have the time or > > qualifications to join the team in exchange for money, we still want to > hear > > from you. > > > > With those two little action items out of the way, here is the gist of > the > > discussion so far.... > > > > Jenkins.org has a website (http://jenkins-ci.org/), but it isn't very > good, > > (made evident in part by the fact that I am posting this message to you > > through this site instead of that one). It contains some documentation, > a > > few blog articles, the Jenkins bits (most importantly), and the plugins > > directory (next most importantly). It is my belief that this site needs > to > > have more of a social, 2-way communication aspect to it such that it can > > truly be the mecca to which Jenkins developers turn when they want their > > soules to be filled with the light of CI/CD knowledge. > > > > To that ends, I have posted a proposal for what that might look here: > > > https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Jenkins+2.0+Website+vision+from+Gus+Reiber > > > > https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/download/attachments/82673948/knowledge-site.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1443574130000 > > > > > ...also, the plugin browsing experience really should be a lot better. > > To that ends, here is a related video: > > http://youtu.be/pMwsZRo5He8 > > > > If you've got $.02.... > > ...drop-em. > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "Jenkins Developers" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an > > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/ee6cd9be-cf19-4630-b5c9-f61fc6263ecf%40googlegroups.com. > > > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/f6d1e652-48d5-437b-b245-23fea33b7a73%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
