Taking off my cloudbees hat and putting on my old hat being based in Europe.

Getting approval to attend conferences abroad (outside Europe) for me was 
not always easy - as it involves large travel and time lost due to this. 
 As such it was easier to go to a european conference.   I also feel that 
yes you get more people in USA-CA but that this could just a critical mass 
and a direct result of its much easier to go to something local than it is 
to travel 9 hours around the globe.  Do you have stats of where people came 
from in the last even - where they predominantly from the bay area?
In the London event I met people that where very basic users of Jenkins 
(just starting) and it was easy for them to go to a local conference. 
 Would these same users make the same investment to go somewhere accross 
the globe - I personally don't think so - which would be a big shame.

The JAMs fill a gap - but I'm not sure that this gap is filled yet - or 
that it will be filled by next year  - certainly there is nothing in the UK 
that I know of - and even then we would need something based in the north 
west as well as somewhere around London.


On Tuesday, October 20, 2015 at 4:51:39 AM UTC+2, Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote:
>
> Putting my CloudBees hat on, I'd like to discuss the following proposed 
> changes to the events in 2016, where we are moving away from JUC into a new 
> model.
>
>
> https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Proposal+-+Revisiting+JUC+in+2016
>
> I put this up for the project meeting agenda in 1.5 week, but I hope to 
> get discussions going well before that.
>
> -- 
> Kohsuke Kawaguchi
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/fd26a289-b46b-4c38-a8b0-34bcfc50feab%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to