> On 22. Mar 2018, at 22:04, R. Tyler Croy <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think we already have some groups, which are almost informal SIGs, such as > Security, GSoC, Infra, etc. The aspects of SIGs which I really would like to > formalize, and support from a community infra standpoint are: > > * Clear problem domain/focus area. > … > > Some SIGs which I would love to see for starters, would be: > > * Security, lead by Daniel
What's the intended relation between existing teams and SIGs? I'm asking mostly about security, which is more narrow in scope that what a potential 'security SIG' would be. Would there be a security team with the narrow scope, and a security SIG with much wider scope? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/007CA23C-D53A-47FA-869F-8A6E2BC73B9B%40beckweb.net. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
