Good job!

I'll just comment what I think could be clarified, really small things...

- "Record SIG meeting, such as via YouTube Live Streaming, and make it 
publicly available. Text-based meetings can use #jenkins-meeting on 
Freenode.." - So is it obligatory to record a meeting or not? should we 
user YouTube AND #jenkins-meeting or one of those?
- "Submit a PR to add a row for the SIG to the table in the 
kubernetes/community README.md file, to create a kubernetes/community 
directory, and to add any SIG-related docs, schedules, roadmaps, etc. to 
your new kubernetes/community/SIG-foo directory." - maybe I'm missing 
something here but is 'kubernetes' here an example or what? What's the 
repository? sorry if it's a dumb question :) I'm simply disoriented  

Is SIG Lead one person responsible for all the administration - recording, 
maintaining communication channels, github accounts etc? Or can this role 
be shared? 

In general I like the document, easy to read, explain motivation behind the 
SIG idea in a nice way. And I do believe we can benefit from having those. 
Just want to make sure SIG Lead won't drown in an "office work" - 
maintaining all the accounts, documents etc :) Meeting every 3 weeks sound 
like a good balance.

BR
Ewelina

On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:57:35 AM UTC+2, R Tyler Croy wrote:
>
> (replies inline) 
>
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2018, R. Tyler Croy wrote: 
>
> > 
> > I have been looking at some of the great things the Kubernetes community 
> has 
> > been doing for ideas we can borrow, and one idea which really sticks out 
> is: 
> > Special Interest Groups (SIGs) 
> >     <
> https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/governance.md#sigs> 
> > 
> > A full list of the Kubernetes community SIGs can be found here: 
> >     <https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/sig-list.md> 
> > 
> > I think we already have some groups, which are almost informal SIGs, 
> such as 
> > Security, GSoC, Infra, etc. The aspects of SIGs which I really would 
> like to 
> > formalize, and support from a community infra standpoint are: 
>
>
> Here's an update, I've written out my first draft of what SIGs might look 
> like 
> for us here: https://github.com/jenkinsci/jep/pull/81 
>
> Please let me know what you all think, I'm especially curious for Daniel, 
> Oliver, Ewelina, and Carlos's thoughts as I am hoping this helps you all 
> get 
> more contribution and focus :) 
>
>
>
> Cheers 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/8cb01ce8-6cbe-4452-b36e-0aa0b306fd17%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to