I would vote for 2.187 as a baseline. FTR https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jenkinsci-dev/oQ8PD1hgYBE for the mailing list selection process proposal.
For the anticipated absence of a government meeting, we will be > selecting next LTS candidate here, on the mailing list. The conclusion > will be wrapped up no longer than Tuesday 27th COB UT > We have a security release on Wednesday. Assuming it is stable, we could use it as a baseline. If we discuss only released versions https://jenkins.io/changelog/#v2.189 has a pretty bad community rating. JENKINS-58912 <https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-58912> / JENKINS-58938 <https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-58938> looks to be a pretty bad regression somewhere, but nobody has investigated the issue so far. It is not clear when and why it happens. I am not sure we are safe to go into LTS with it. So 2.187 is my preference (2.188 was burned) BR, Oleg On Monday, August 26, 2019 at 11:00:47 AM UTC+2, ogondza wrote: > > For the anticipated absence of a government meeting, we will be > selecting next LTS candidate here, on the mailing list. The conclusion > will be wrapped up no longer than Tuesday 27th COB UTC time. Feel free > to share your thoughts here. > > --- > > I believe we affectively only have 2 candidates[1], 2.189 and 2.190. > Since 2.190 has relatively few changes in it, all minor, got 2 weeks of > soaking with nothing but positive community feedback, I vote to choose > that despite being the latest weekly published. > > [1] https://jenkins.io/changelog/ > > -- > oliver > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/2577f42d-5a15-4995-b5f8-a97de6a60fe7%40googlegroups.com.
