So I guess that eliminates 2.191 as a choice for LTS. I do not feel that
strong choosing between 2.190 and 2.187, and it appears Oleg and Mark
leans that way.
Any other inputs?
On 27/08/2019 11.15, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
There is a confirmed regression in Jenkins 2.191 / Remoting 3.34
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-59094
I think it a serious obstacle for this version or for the tomorrow's
security fix as a baseline.
BR, Oleg
On Monday, August 26, 2019 at 1:37:18 PM UTC+2, Mark Waite wrote:
I've started testing 2.190 late Friday. I did not find any
immediate reasons to reject it as the LTS. The security release
scheduled for Wednesday seems to me like a good reason to prefer
choosing 2.190 as a baseline, then update to the security release as
the baseline after it is delivered.
I haven't investigated the startup failures reported in
JENKINS-58912 and JENKINS-58938.
I'm also concerned about JENKINS-58692 from the KDE project
beginning in 2.186. Jesse Glick investigated it and was unable to
duplicate it. The KDE project found a workaround (install the
symlinks plugin) and can't really explore other options because it
is their production system. JENKINS-58692 will affect 2.186 and
later, so it seems relevant to investigate further as a risk to any
LTS version we select.
I prefer the upcoming security release as the baseline, but
JENKINS-58912 and JENKINS-58938 need investigation before the LTS
is released.
Mark Waite
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 6:28 AM Oleg Nenashev <[email protected]
<javascript:>> wrote:
I would vote for 2.187 as a baseline. FTR
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jenkinsci-dev/oQ8PD1hgYBE
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jenkinsci-dev/oQ8PD1hgYBE> for
the mailing list selection process proposal.
For the anticipated absence of a government meeting, we will be
selecting next LTS candidate here, on the mailing list. The
conclusion
will be wrapped up no longer than Tuesday 27th COB UT
We have a security release on Wednesday. Assuming it is stable,
we could use it as a baseline.
If we discuss only released versions
https://jenkins.io/changelog/#v2.189
<https://jenkins.io/changelog/#v2.189> has a pretty bad
community rating. JENKINS-58912
<https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-58912> /
JENKINS-58938
<https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-58938> looks to be
a pretty bad regression somewhere, but nobody has investigated
the issue so far. It is not clear when and why it happens. I am
not sure we are safe to go into LTS with it. So 2.187 is my
preference (2.188 was burned)
BR, Oleg
On Monday, August 26, 2019 at 11:00:47 AM UTC+2, ogondza wrote:
For the anticipated absence of a government meeting, we will be
selecting next LTS candidate here, on the mailing list. The
conclusion
will be wrapped up no longer than Tuesday 27th COB UTC time.
Feel free
to share your thoughts here.
---
I believe we affectively only have 2 candidates[1], 2.189
and 2.190.
Since 2.190 has relatively few changes in it, all minor, got
2 weeks of
soaking with nothing but positive community feedback, I vote
to choose
that despite being the latest weekly published.
[1] https://jenkins.io/changelog/
--
oliver
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
it, send an email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/2577f42d-5a15-4995-b5f8-a97de6a60fe7%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/2577f42d-5a15-4995-b5f8-a97de6a60fe7%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
Thanks!
Mark Waite
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/8346a1c4-ca52-4f6f-b89a-f00bb0eb48e2%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/8346a1c4-ca52-4f6f-b89a-f00bb0eb48e2%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
oliver
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins
Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/c38516e9-a901-2014-d00a-1fcbcb225af1%40gmail.com.