Dear Mr. Forgy,

I reviewed the PST Web site, but could find no reference to pricing
or evaluations for the OPSJ product. I would like to get information 
on both. Would you please refer me to the appropriate person?

Walter Lambert

At 07:41 PM 10/3/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Since there has been some general discussion of alternatives
>to JESS for this NMS application, I would like to suggest 
>another alternative: OPSJ.  OPSJ is a Java-based rule system,
>but it is quite different from JESS.  OPSJ is designed primarily
>for building rule-based components.  For this reason, we have
>tried to eliminate the "mismatch" between proprietary rule
>languages (such as OPS5 or CLIPS) and more conventional languages
>such as Java.  In particular, OPSJ operates directly on arbitary 
>Java classes; there is no special "fact" type.  Also, OPSJ can use 
>any Java API directly. No glue code or special declarations are 
>required.
>
>OPSJ uses an advanced form of the Rete algorithm known as Rete
>II to give it much better performance than Rete-based tools 
>such as CLIPS.  Information about OPSJ can be found on the PST
>web site, http://www.pst.com
>
>                                  -- Charles Forgy
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the
>list. List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the
list. List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to