Great !! Not only because of that, but the systems that are in production
now are using 1.1 ! Compatibility is ALWAYS a good argument.
Wellington
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin A. Burton [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2000 12:11 AM
To: JetSpeed
Subject: Re: VM question
Eric Anderson wrote:
>
> Does JetSpeed truly require a 1.2 VM? If so, is this solely
because of the
> Collections classes?
> If Collections are the big requirement, has anyone tried the Sun
1.1
> collections classes (com.sun.java.util.collections)?
> On a project I'm working on now we moved from a 1.2VM to IBM's
1.1.8 VM
> with no problems whatsoever, using the 1.1 collections package.
> Of course, some import statements had to be changed.
>
> -Eric
>
JetSpeed 1.0b2 won't require JDK 1.2. The requirement was because
of
some JavaMail features. Namely you need so to a
System.setProperty()
for your providers (which isn't available on 1.1 VMs.)
This code has been removed so you can run it on JDK 1.1.
1.1 conformance is very big for me to! I am on Linux and want to
run
that IBM JDK 1.1.8 :)
Kevin
--
Kevin A Burton
http://relativity.yi.org
Linux - You *will* be assimilated.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
