On 21/09/16 11:58, Remi Forax wrote: > I agree. > And Layer should also be called Module Layer.
I don't really agree or disagree whether the above and previous names might have been better choices but is it really important enough to merit changing it all now after users have already started writing code to this set of names? (my Byteman agent for example). This sounds to me a tad like asking for class BikeShedding to be renamed to ModuleBikeShedding. Yes, if we are going to bike shed about module nomenclature then we probably ought to do so as diligently and earnestly as possible but ... really? regards, Andrew Dinn ----------- Senior Principal Software Engineer Red Hat UK Ltd Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903 Directors: Michael Cunningham, Michael ("Mike") O'Neill, Eric Shander