On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 20:10 +0000, sebb wrote: > OK by me, with one proviso - would it be easy to optionally generate > JMX files in the old format? That should make the transition easier > for some.
Yeah, I can do that. > > I am intending to create a 2.0.3 release soon, as there are quite a > few useful fixes in 2.0. > > S. > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:47:03 -0500, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'll try to move the webservice related docs on wiki this weekend > > also. along with general clean up. > > > > peter > > > > > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 11:08:02 -0500, Mike Stover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I plan on devoting some of my time in the next 2 weeks to > > > 1. cleaning out obsolete documentation in the wiki > > > 2. Moving the User Manual from the web site to the wiki > > Not sure about this at all - why would that help? Because we have a lot of trouble keeping the docs up-to-date, and a lot of useful user information is split between the user-manual and the wiki area. If we put it all on the wiki, users can update the documenation for us (ie, users often learn things about the components I don't even know/realize - no reason they can't put it in the documentation directly if it's on the wiki). Plus, updating the docs becomes easier - just change the wiki, forget about writing it in xml then transforming it to html then uploading to apache... > > > > 3. Putting finishing touches on the code in CVS HEAD > > > 4. Making the 2.1 branch in preparation for a release. > > > > > > What do people think? > > > > > > -Mike > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
