+

it would be good to know.  Plus, I'm willing to maintain the 2.x line
and potential jdk5 version which maybe version 3 or 4.

other projects have multiple versions like axis, tomcat, jstl, etc. 

peter


On 8/16/05, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HP have just released a beta version of JDK 1.5 for OpenVMS. It is
> likely to be some months before a full version is released. There is
> as yet not even a beta for Tru 64 Unix nor for OpenVMS I64 (Itanium).
> 
> However, it may not just be those OSes that have yet to get a 1.5 JVM.
> 
> I think we need to find out how many people would be affected by this 
> proposal.
> 
> S.
> On 16/08/05, Michael Stover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 22:28 +0100, sebb wrote:
> > > Not sure what Tomcat has to do with it. And the problem is that some
> > > OSes don't yet have a 1.5 JVM.
> >
> > Right - that's a completely different issue than having to install them
> > on "servers" remotely or corporations that won't allow developers to
> > install 1.5 on their machines (wtf?).  I really don't intend to hold
> > back for the sake of irrational fears about just installing 1.5 on a
> > random machine.
> >
> > So anyway, back to my question - any idea when vms will get jdk1.5 for
> > it?  The next big release of JMeter won't be for a long time, if history
> > is any indication of the future.
> >
> > -Mike
> >
> > >
> > > If 1.5 is required to build JMeter, that's OK, but it's not OK for us
> > > if JMeter requires 1.5 in order to run.
> > >
> > > S.
> > > On 15/08/05, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > one potential way around that would be to include just the JRE with
> > > > tomcat. What do others think about that?
> > > >
> > > > I understand the desire to stick to 1.4.2 for backward compatability.
> > > >
> > > > peter
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 8/15/05, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Our desktops are located far away (physically and network-wise) from
> > > > > the servers we want to test, so the network overhead would be too
> > > > > great to use them to drive our server testing.
> > > > >
> > > > > So although JMeter is not a server app, we actually use it on a server
> > > > > (in non-GUI mode).
> > > > >
> > > > > S.
> > > > > On 15/08/05, Michael Stover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > JMeter is not a server app, however.  It's a client app and users 
> > > > > > can
> > > > > > install jdk1.5 on their client machines without affecting the 
> > > > > > servers
> > > > > > being tested.  After all, JMeter is not about testing JAVA apps, 
> > > > > > it's
> > > > > > about testing servers that may not even be running Java code or 
> > > > > > have any
> > > > > > JVM installed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Mike
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 22:07 +0200, Martijn Blankestijn wrote:
> > > > > > > I think it will take a long time before all userss will upgrade 
> > > > > > > to Java
> > > > > > > 5, therefore I think that the minimum should be at least 1.4 for 
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > next release.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martijn
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Michael Stover wrote:
> > > > > > > > Can we assume use of jdk1.5+ for JMeter's future release after 
> > > > > > > > 2.1?
> > > > > > > > Anyone have a problem with that?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -Mike
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to