Miguel sent (2004.06.02 at 9.36a [+0200gmt]) : > >>Animation in jmol runs far better than in chime, but I must say >>that it is DIFFERENT. Following the animframecallbacks on a 7-frame >>file >> >>http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr/jmol/test/t.htm >> >>jmol: 012345654321012345654321... >> >>(pretty reasonable, huh?) > >Yes ... but if I am sending you a frame '0' then that is a bug. >Maybe the frame indices are off. > >> >>chime: 123456654321001234566543210... > >Looks to me like this is in 'palindrome' mode and that they are >playing the first and last frames twice. > >In Jmol, palindrome mode (and loop mode) I plan to have (by default) >a 1 second delay on the first frame, and a 1 second delay on the >last frame. One can override those values. >
how about an option to show the current frame number, say in the lower left corner of the applet space? might be useful in some instances... just a thought, tim -- Timothy Driscoll molvisions - see, grasp, learn. <http://www.molvisions.com/> usa:north carolina:wake forest ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. >From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
