Am Mittwoch, den 01.02.2006, 16:36 +0100 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > De: "Miguel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >> So where is Jmol-HEAD? > > > >Don't know.
That's the name for the directory, where you copy the checkout (you don't need to call it Jmol-HEAD, that's only a recommendation). Please refer to sourceforge.net's basic CVS instructions or to general CVS instruction and read more about the '-d <directory>' option (which defines the checkout-directory). > >But, there is something that I should bring up. > > > >The name 'Jmol-HEAD' is a vestige from the transition to v10.00., No. It's related to which revision was checked out (commonly used suffix for the HEAD revision). > >I would > >be in favor of moving the directory from 'Jmol-HEAD' to 'Jmol'. That would > >simplify the checkout procedure somewhat because the default project name > >could be used for the directory. That might make things simpler for > >Eclipse and other IDEs (Integrated Development Environments). > > I vote for it also. You are free to change the documentation. But this is really optional. Adding the '_HEAD' suffix only makes clear, which version was checked out. > I kept it in the Eclipse procedure because I think Jmol-HEAD is still > used in build.xml or some other build file. No, it is not. It only appears inside the documentation which refers to Eclipse procedures (and in a comment by Egon in FileDropper.java and two in README). Regards, Daniel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
