On Mar 23, 2007, at 11:05 AM, Bob Hanson wrote: > In February of 2005 the default in Jmol was changed from "zoom 100" > scaling to fit the the smaller dimension (so that a model is > automatically always on screen) to scaling to fit the larger dimension > (so that a model generally goes off screen along the smaller > dimension, > but fills the applet in the larger dimension.) Now that we can resize > the applet and application easily, people are going to start doing it, > these questions will come up. So I ask them now. > > 1) Why was that done? (Miguel?) > 2) Could we ever consider going back to the Chime default? (users?) > sounds like a good idea to me.
> My problem: First, this change has always bugged me. I didn't > understand > the rationale then, and I can't remember it now. I don't see why > anyone > would one ever want the molecule to automatically be larger than the > window in one dimension. I can't either, though as I recall there was some lengthy discussion about this issue many months ago. tim -- Timothy Driscoll em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Virginia Bioinformatics Institute ph: 540-231-3007 Bioinformatics I: M-1 im: molvisions Washington St., Blacksburg, VA 24061 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
