> My problem: First, this change has always bugged me. I didn't understand > the rationale then, and I can't remember it now. I don't see why anyone > would one ever want the molecule to automatically be larger than the > window in one dimension.
I hope I can summarize my viewpoint in favour of large being the default: If the webpage author decides for a non-square applet, it's because (s)he has a long molecule. Fitting by default to the shorter dimension sounds reasonable in general terms, but is a waste of applet space in rectangular applets. Of course, whatever the default is, there's always the option of forcing "zoomLarge true". So, any decision is not a major problem. The resizable window puts forward that such option may not be the best, but in this case it's the user who will choose **any** resizement, so that he can see the molecule. I don't object having small as default, but see no much difference. Regarding the coding, I really don't appreciate why one option gives more trouble than the other; if it's complicating things, then go ahead (I suppose that the current value of zoomLarge cannot be read and duplicated). Naive question: if zoomLarge is the default, why has it got to be removed from the state --I mean, why include it in the state for a start? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
