El 18 Jan 2009 a las 21:51, Robert Hanson escribió: > comments: > > -- camera angle is not correct.
I had realized that the orientation was different. Don't know anything about that, but it is as it was in the first exporter. I will study the vrml doc to see if I can find the proper way. I suspect that the axes orientation may be different than in Jmol. Could that be the cause? Correction: the orientation is OK, but matches the Jmol model as in "reset", so it is the current orientation that is not being exported. > -- huge distortion is a result of incorrect camera positioning. I'm not sure what distorsion you mean. There is a big perspective effect, but when you rotate the model around it looks pretty similar to Jmol's. > -- are font sizes correct? No. They are all fixed at 0.4A. I know how to read Jmol's font size, but vrml only works in angstroms, not pixels, and I don't think we can do any reasonable conversion. The difference, as I see it, is: - Jmol fonts are in pixels, by default at a fixed size irrespective of zoom. Or they can be optionally scalable with zoom. - VRML fonts are objects, must be dimensioned in angstroms and will always be rescalable. So the result will always be different than in Jmol anyway. The only thing we are missing is a possible difference in size among lables. I don't think we can find a solution for that. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
