I have NOT removed the obsolete IDs. They are still there for 
backwards compatibility. I just moved them all to the last line so 
they are easily identified as such.
After all, we are supporting old atom and residue names like A T G C 
in DNA, both 3' and 3* etc.
Unless the same IDs are now used for non-carbohydrate groups (see 
below). That would lead to strange groups being taken as 
carbohydrate, which I think should not happen.


>     ASF is N-GLYCOSYL CHAIN

When was that? ASF, when I check in the PDB, says a totally different 
group. That's why I removed it.
http://ligand-expo.rcsb.org/ld-search.html
ASF = 3-(butylsulfonyl)propanoic acid
NAM = NAPTHYLAMINOALANINE


I haven't changed 12.0 yet, probably will do tonight.


> I wonder how hard it would be to get the whole list of carbohydrates 
> from PDB. I guess that could be a long list....

Yes, it may well be. At least we should have the most common. Please 
check out the wiki page I put up yesterday for this. Particularly the 
cathegorized section, that's more helpful.


>     The reason to include them is that 
>     "carbohydrates" is used in its more inclusive term, not just for 
>     Cx(H2O)y. Right?

No, I wasn´t that picky. For me, anything that goes in an 
oligosaccharide in a glycoprotein should be included (as it is part 
of the macromolecule). More those than ligands like lactose or 
cellotriose, which are fine.

Anyone knows of other group IDs that should be added? Please email or 
use the Talk page for 
http://wiki.jmol.org/index.php/AtomSets/Carbohydrate



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
Jmol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers

Reply via email to