Don't get me wrong -- I'm totally supportive of this effort. I just got
mixed up because I didn't realize that PDB had a different name for NAM than
what biochemists all know as NAM (AMU). So that was missing. Here's an
example (probably of no more than 8 examples total) of where NAM is NAM:
<!-- Jaime Prilusky Jul 1996 -->
<BODY><HTML><TITLE>PDB Full entry for 9LYZ</TITLE>
...
<PRE>HEADER HYDROLASE (O-GLYCOSYL) 06-DEC-79 9LYZ
9LYZ 3
COMPND LYSOZYME (NAM-NAG-NAM SUBSTRATE ONLY) <A HREF="
http://expasy.hcuge.ch/cgi-bin/get-enzyme-entry?3.2.1.17";>(E.C.3.2.1.17)</A>
9LYZ 4
...
REMARK 5 CORRECTION. INSERT REVDAT RECORDS. 30-SEP-83.
9LYZA 4
SEQRES 1 S 3 NAM NAG NAM
9LYZ 27
<a href="/cgi-bin/send-het?NAM">HET NAM</a> S 1 19
2-ACETAMIDO-2-DEOXY-D-MURAMIC ACID 9LYZ 28
<a href="/cgi-bin/send-het?NAG">HET NAG</a> S 2 14
2-ACETAMIDO-2-DEOXY-D-GLUCOSE 9LYZ 29
<a href="/cgi-bin/send-het?NAM">HET NAM</a> S 3 20
2-ACETAMIDO-2-DEOXY-D-MURAMIC ACID 9LYZ 30
FORMUL 1 NAM 2(C11 H19 N1 O8)
9LYZ 31
FORMUL 2 NAG C8 H11 N1 O6
9LYZ 32
But the new name for that is AMU, and I'm totally for only using that, and I
added it, along with the epimer of NAG, NDG.
Do we still then need NAM?
--
Robert M. Hanson
Professor of Chemistry
St. Olaf College
1520 St. Olaf Ave.
Northfield, MN 55057
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr
phone: 507-786-3107
If nature does not answer first what we want,
it is better to take what answer we get.
-- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
Jmol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
