UNFAIR!!! > Bob, Tim , Phil et. al. > My finding is similar and yet different. > I have loaded Tim's original test page, sandwiched between two pages of > mine which use different copies of JmolApplet.jar files on my local Mac, > and all pages execute as designed in Safari, even reloading in a random > fashion. However Bob's two pages, which I found to perform properly in > two earlier tests fail when added to the group. The others continue to > function well after this addition. > Bill > > Bob Hanson wrote: > >> sure. sorry. Between the two we have two different JmolApplet.jar >> files being used on the SAME site, and between them and your page we >> have two different JmolApplet.jar files on two DIFFERENT sites. Same >> file. >> >> All should do the same thing exactly.... Right? .... maybe not on some >> Macs... depending upon how they are loaded. >> >> Bob >> >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! > Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net > Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey > Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix > _______________________________________________ > Jmol-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users >
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
