Phil,
Good point! I am running OSX10.3.9 and java 1.4.2_05_141.4
Bill
Philip Bays wrote:
OK. To be sure we are all on the same page. Let me ask you to specify what you are running. We are all running OSX 10.3.9? And if you type java -version in terminal, do you see 1.4.2_05_141.3 or 1.4.2_05_141.4?
Phil
On Apr 26, 2005, at 4:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UNFAIR!!!
Bob, Tim , Phil et. al.
My finding is similar and yet different.
I have loaded Tim's original test page, sandwiched between two pages of
mine which use different copies of JmolApplet.jar files on my local Mac,
and all pages execute as designed in Safari, even reloading in a random
fashion. However Bob's two pages, which I found to perform properly in
two earlier tests fail when added to the group. The others continue to
function well after this addition.
Bill
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
