Eric wrote: > I found that if I did > > monitor 200 201 > > no line appeared, until I spacefilled the monitored atoms. [snip]
Bob & Miguel wrote: >> please report this as a bug. Clearly monitor should not >> depend upon there being spacefilled atoms. > > Agreed ... it is a bug. In investigating this I see that my code is explicitly checking to see that the atoms involved are *visible* ... where visible means that either the atoms themselves have some screen representation OR there are bonds that clearly indicate where the atom would be. I am doing the testing for distances, angles, and torsion angles. I do not remember why this test was put there. And my current thinking is that it should be removed. However, the code was clearly it was put there for a particular reason. So that makes me wonder why. Q: Can anyone think of any reason why I would have written code to turn off measurements if all of the atoms involved in the measurement are not visible? Miguel ----- Open Source Molecular Visualization www.jmol.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
