In a message dated 1/13/01 8:09:52 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

<< As I said in my original post, you certainly are entitled to your religious
 beliefs.  And likewise, Clark.  What I found offensive, telling, and
 frightening, about your bringing homosexuality into the discussion is just
 the fact that you felt compelled to do so.  >>

all the reasons you cite later to reject bush are fine by me.  my ONLY issue 
with this whole thread can be expressed in the following sentence:

it is as wrong to judge a man for his spirituality as it is to judge him for 
his sexuality.

clark cited bush's faith in jesus as a reason why he distrusts him suggesting 
he is given to magic and myth.  i reject that.  

the reason why i suggest the book to you has to do with this man's 
philosophy.  he posits that prejudice against homosexuals began in the 
synagogs and churches of the judeo christian tradition.  at the same time, he 
recognizes his own spirituality which is as intrinsic to his personality as 
is his sexuality.  finally, he cites the basic premise of chiristianity which 
is that love transcends law and in that simple message will evolve the 
resolution of all prejudice.

i am not an evangelist.  at the same time, i feel that i have tried to share 
my experience in this threat about my spirituality in response to clark's 
indictment and in doing that, my experience was not heard over the wounds of 
prejudice.  and what i read is reaction to right wingers and fundamentalists 
and conservatives and so on and so forth.  

i don't know that i fit in any of those windows, stephen.   but i do know i'm 
a spiritual man and my spirituality is as real and piercing and meaningful as 
my sexuality.  it is not a belief.  my spirituality is an experience.  it is 
who i am.  and i have been told twice now on this thread that i am wrong 
about that.  and i feel like a gay man now, being told his reality is wrong 
and being forced into a category of judgement into which i don't fit.    and 
that is why i raised the sexuality issue.  

but i will put it to rest now.  
patrick

Reply via email to