Is it a double standard that causes me to see Jackson as retaining some 
integrity where I saw Clinton as greasy?

Is it the act of admission and responsibility versus the act of denial and 
cover-up that allows me to see these two individual from a different slant? 

Is the difference in the behavior of the final act enough to justify such a 
different reaction in me regarding the quality of the core behavior itself? 

I feel Jackson to be human while I felt Clinton to be a hologram.

I feel...Oh, Jesse Jackson...what a loss...whereas I felt...Clinton...Get the 
hell out of here!

What's up with that?

Susan 

Reply via email to