Is it a double standard that causes me to see Jackson as retaining some
integrity where I saw Clinton as greasy?
Is it the act of admission and responsibility versus the act of denial and
cover-up that allows me to see these two individual from a different slant?
Is the difference in the behavior of the final act enough to justify such a
different reaction in me regarding the quality of the core behavior itself?
I feel Jackson to be human while I felt Clinton to be a hologram.
I feel...Oh, Jesse Jackson...what a loss...whereas I felt...Clinton...Get the
hell out of here!
What's up with that?
Susan