Thank you very much for your feedback, Steinar.
I've cross linked your detailed suggestions from issue #5896 for better
referencing.

Best Regards,
Lukas

2017-03-21 13:35 GMT+01:00 <steinar.drags...@miles.no>:

> Hi
>
> As mentioned earlier, I really like the flexibility that .Net MicroORMs
> offer. This could be offered by JOOQ as well with more unmapper support:
> https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/5896
>
> Currently I get by with some custom extensions:
>
> ColumnValueMap valMapper = ColumnValueMap.*create*("OWNERSYS.OWNER")
>         .add(*field*("ID"), generatedSeqKey)
>         .add(*field*("ENTITY_ID"), owner.getEntityId().Value)
>         .add(*field*("NAME"), owner.getName())
>         .add(*field*("OFFICIAL_SOURCE"), owner.getOfficialSourceType().
> getValue())
>         .add(*field*("BUSINESS_TYPE_ID"), owner.getBusinessType().
> getValue())
>         .add(*field*("OWNER_TYPE_ID"), owner.getOwnerType().getValue())
>         .add(*field*("VALID_FROM"), new 
> Timestamp(owner.getValidFrom().toInstant().getEpochSecond()
> * 1000L))
>         .add(*field*("VALID_UNTIL"), new 
> Timestamp(owner.getValidUntil().toInstant().getEpochSecond()
> * 1000L))
>         .add(*field*("REGISTERED_TIME"), new Timestamp(owner.
> getRegisteredTime().toInstant().getEpochSecond() * 1000L));
>
> ctx.insertInto(*table*(valMapper.Table), valMapper.getColumns()).
> values(valMapper.getValues()).execute();
>
> ..
>
> This is almost identical to what is already supported by JOOQ, the
> difference is that you get more compact code by mapping column and value in
> a single .add() method, thus the expression will become more compact, which
> again increases readability.
>
>
>
> An example of using the ColumnFieldMapper on simple types:
>
> ..
>
> Contact c = new Contact(0,"*t_at_t.no <http://t_at_t.no>*", "99221144", "Mr
> Anonymous");
> ColumnFieldMap<Contact> mapper = new ColumnFieldMap<>(c,
> "OWNERSYS.CONTACT");
> mapper.add(*field*("ID"), "Id").add(*field*("EMAIL"), "Email").add(*field*
> ("PHONE"), "Phone").add(*field*("NAME"), "Name");
> ctx.insertInto(*table*(mapper.Table), mapper.getColumns()).values(
> mapper.getValues()).execute();
>
>
> Having support for more unmapper features in JOOQ would be great, and it
> is ultra flexible.
>
> Thanks,
> Steinar.
>
> P.S I would not mind if the DAO support was removed.
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 2:16:44 PM UTC+2, Lukas Eder wrote:
>
>> Dear group,
>>
>> Part of jOOQ's success is its incredible amount of convenience methods
>> that help reduce the boiler plate code at your side. We do this with
>> massive overloading of API, for instance, when you work with fetch(), you
>> may have noticed how many different types of fetch() there are in jOOQ.
>>
>> Just now, I have added yet another convenience method. A Converter
>> constructor:
>> https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/5398
>>
>> It looks like this:
>>
>>     static <T, U> Converter<T, U> of(
>>         Class<T> fromType,
>>         Class<U> toType,
>>         Function<? super T, ? extends U> from,
>>         Function<? super U, ? extends T> to
>>     ) { ... }
>>
>> And also:
>>
>>     static <T, U> Converter<T, U> ofNullable(
>>         Class<T> fromType,
>>         Class<U> toType,
>>         Function<? super T, ? extends U> from,
>>         Function<? super U, ? extends T> to
>>     ) {
>>         return of(
>>             fromType,
>>             toType,
>>             t -> t == null ? null : from.apply(t),
>>             u -> u == null ? null : to.apply(u)
>>         );
>>     }
>>
>>
>> The above allows for creating simple ad-hoc, one-liner converters, such
>> as:
>>
>>     Converter<String, Integer> converter =
>>     Converter.ofNullable(String.class, Integer.class, Integer::parseInt,
>> Object::toString);
>>
>> What's your biggest "itch" in the jOOQ API, which jOOQ could "scratch",
>> or rather, make go away by adding new convenience API?
>>
>> All ideas welcome!
>> Lukas
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "jOOQ User Group" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to jooq-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ 
User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jooq-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to