1. Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than the JWS and JWE headers ARE important.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Anthony Nadalin <[email protected]>wrote: > 1. Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than > the JWS and JWE headers ARE important. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Mike Jones > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 8:25 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at > least on key indicator be mandatory > > 1. Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than > the JWS and JWE headers ARE important. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Roland Hedberg [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 1:33 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; Mike Jones > Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at > least on key indicator be mandatory > > I support 1 as defined by Mike. > > 12 apr 2013 kl. 07:25 skrev Mike Jones <[email protected]>: > > > 1. Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other > than the JWS and JWE headers ARE important > > -- Roland > > From: Mike Jones > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:25 PM > To: '[email protected]'; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at > least on key indicator be mandatory > > Reading this question, I believe that there's a possibility for the > question to be misinterpreted, since the sense of the question in the > subject is opposite of the sense of the question in the body. I believe > that the intent of 1 and 2 were as follows: > > 1. Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than > the JWS and JWE headers ARE important. > 2. No - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than > the JWS and JWE headers ARE NOT important. > > Maybe people could reply with 1 and 2 as above, so that their answers to > the question of whether these use cases are important are not are > unambiguous. > > -- Mike > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Karen O'Donoghue > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 5:00 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at > least on key indicator be mandatory > > Issue #15 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/15. suggests > requiring that a key indicator, such as a "kid" field, be required in all > JWS and JWE headers. Are use cases where key information is exchanged by > means other than the JWS or JWE headers important? > Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue? > 1. Yes. > 2. No. > 0. I need more information to decide. > > Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th (or earlier). > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > > > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose >
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
