1. Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than the JWS and JWE headers ARE important
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Matias Woloski <[email protected]> wrote: > 1. Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than > the JWS and JWE headers ARE important. > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Anthony Nadalin <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> 1. Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than >> the JWS and JWE headers ARE important. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Mike Jones >> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 8:25 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at >> least on key indicator be mandatory >> >> 1. Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than >> the JWS and JWE headers ARE important. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Roland Hedberg [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 1:33 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected]; Mike Jones >> Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at >> least on key indicator be mandatory >> >> I support 1 as defined by Mike. >> >> 12 apr 2013 kl. 07:25 skrev Mike Jones <[email protected]>: >> >> > 1. Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other >> > than the JWS and JWE headers ARE important >> >> -- Roland >> >> From: Mike Jones >> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:25 PM >> To: '[email protected]'; [email protected] >> Subject: RE: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at >> least on key indicator be mandatory >> >> Reading this question, I believe that there's a possibility for the >> question to be misinterpreted, since the sense of the question in the >> subject is opposite of the sense of the question in the body. I believe >> that the intent of 1 and 2 were as follows: >> >> 1. Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than >> the JWS and JWE headers ARE important. >> 2. No - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than >> the JWS and JWE headers ARE NOT important. >> >> Maybe people could reply with 1 and 2 as above, so that their answers to >> the question of whether these use cases are important are not are >> unambiguous. >> >> -- Mike >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Karen O'Donoghue >> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 5:00 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at >> least on key indicator be mandatory >> >> Issue #15 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/15. suggests >> requiring that a key indicator, such as a "kid" field, be required in all >> JWS and JWE headers. Are use cases where key information is exchanged by >> means other than the JWS or JWE headers important? >> Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue? >> 1. Yes. >> 2. No. >> 0. I need more information to decide. >> >> Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th (or earlier). >> _______________________________________________ >> jose mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jose mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > > > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > -- --Breno _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
