AFAIK, there are still no proposals on the table to register hybrid signature schemes for JOSE or COSE.
I suppose we are lucky that we can't go faster than NIST on signatures anyway : ) Since it's been a while since we presented these drafts, when they were adopted by COSE we agreed to hold them until the dust settles. For now, we are just trying to keep them aligned with the name and parameter set changes that have happened since they were adopted. I'm reading between the lines here, that perhaps I should wait to add the full parameter set for SPHINCS+ ? * crosses fingers hoping for a yes * OS On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 12:48 PM Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hiya, > > On 13/01/2024 14:53, Orie Steele wrote: > > I agree with your comments, but given the trends we see in LAMPS / TLS, I > > feel it's important that when post quantum signatures roll out elsewhere, > > JOSE and COSE have support for them to the same degree that other > protocols > > do. > > I don't think there's clear consensus on how pressing signatures > are in TLS. And hybrid signatures remain controversial in LAMPS. > Yes there are a set of folks who want as much PQ as they can get > done as soon as they can, but there're also some (incl. me) who'd > prefer to go slower on signatures for the reasons already stated > and also because of rainbow. > > Cheers, > S. > -- ORIE STEELE Chief Technology Officer www.transmute.industries <https://transmute.industries>
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
