On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Marc Schütz wrote:

Well Marc Schütz is in theory completely wrong that don't and "do not"
are "not freely interchangeable". "Don't" is a contraction of "do not"
and means exactly the same thing by definition.

Then why is not this sentence right?

Then why is this sentence not right?

"Isn't" replacement means not "is not" is at exactly the same position. I don't think you can find examples, where removing the contradiction will change the meaning.

Ciao
--
http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)
_______________________________________________
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev

Reply via email to