it's not about the name, it's about arguments plus returned value.
I do not know why John decided at that time to make jQuery.fn.each "a bit
redundant" avoiding JS 1.6 forEach MDC specs and limiting performances boost
via native callback ( it would be a double wrap, one to return the jQuery
object plus one to swap arguments into forEach ).
prototype.each = function(callback){
var $this = this;
Array.prorotype.forEach.call(this, function(el, i, all){
callback.call($this, i, el);
});
return this;
};
Above snippet will decrease performances, rather than increase them ...
If interested, with vice-versa you have perfromaneces focused Array JS 1.8
methods in every browser:
http://code.google.com/p/vice-versa/
Regards
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Diogo Baeder <[email protected]> wrote:
> I know that the Array.prototype.forEach method implementation and $.each
> differ in signature, but was this discussion ever raised here at the list to
> consider the performance boost? I think IE8, for example, has already
> implemented these newer JS methods, already... (I've not tested it yet, but
> will soon.)
>
> Thanks!
>
> __________________________
> Diogo Baeder
> http://www.diogobaeder.com.br
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
