P.S. Array.forEach is standard in FireFox and some other browser, so it is still native one
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Andrea Giammarchi < [email protected]> wrote: > jQuery.forEach = Array.forEach || function(){ ... } > > now you are close to vice-versa logic, where you can simply use > Array.forEach with every array like variable, DOM colelctions included ;-) > > > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 6:39 PM, diogobaeder <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> Hmmm... almost there, in my opinion, Andrea... I think it could be >> used in the main jQuery object (singleton), also, to minimize browser >> dependance, if the user wants to use it with normal Array objects... >> like: >> >> jQuery.forEach(myArrayObject, , myCallback, myContext); >> >> What do you think? This way, the client code can use it both with >> Array objects and jQuery wrapped DOM objects... >> >> Diogo >> >> >> >> On May 20, 3:35 am, Andrea Giammarchi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > JQuery.fn.forEach = Array.prototype.forEach || function(){ ... }; easy? >> :-) >> > >> > On May 20, 2009 3:07 AM, "diogobaeder" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Matt, >> > >> > I think your approach is usefull only if one wants to create a new >> > jQuery method... because checking everytime if forEach method exists >> > is not easily maintainable... >> > >> > Maybe it could be a $.forEach, applying the Mozilla implementation if >> > the browser doesn't support the method... what do you guys think of >> > it? >> > >> > Diogo >> > >> > On May 19, 11:29 am, Matt Kruse <[email protected]> wrote: > On >> May >> > 19, 9:19 am, diogobaede... >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
