jQuery.forEach = Array.forEach || function(){ ... }
now you are close to vice-versa logic, where you can simply use
Array.forEach with every array like variable, DOM colelctions included ;-)
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 6:39 PM, diogobaeder <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hmmm... almost there, in my opinion, Andrea... I think it could be
> used in the main jQuery object (singleton), also, to minimize browser
> dependance, if the user wants to use it with normal Array objects...
> like:
>
> jQuery.forEach(myArrayObject, , myCallback, myContext);
>
> What do you think? This way, the client code can use it both with
> Array objects and jQuery wrapped DOM objects...
>
> Diogo
>
>
>
> On May 20, 3:35 am, Andrea Giammarchi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > JQuery.fn.forEach = Array.prototype.forEach || function(){ ... }; easy?
> :-)
> >
> > On May 20, 2009 3:07 AM, "diogobaeder" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Matt,
> >
> > I think your approach is usefull only if one wants to create a new
> > jQuery method... because checking everytime if forEach method exists
> > is not easily maintainable...
> >
> > Maybe it could be a $.forEach, applying the Mozilla implementation if
> > the browser doesn't support the method... what do you guys think of
> > it?
> >
> > Diogo
> >
> > On May 19, 11:29 am, Matt Kruse <[email protected]> wrote: > On
> May
> > 19, 9:19 am, diogobaede...
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
